Crypto Barrister Bash

It proved to be another roaring success. The format was simple: eight minutes for each barrister on the panel to advocate that their case was the most significant crypto judgment in this jurisdiction to date. Attacking an opponent's case as much as advocating one's own case was strongly encouraged, which paved the way for a hotly contested and, at times, hilarious debate (with some moments of sheer oratorical brutality).

The audience was then asked to vote via their phones for the winner.  Whilst the results were extremely tight, it was Ion Science v Persons Unknown which came out on top, deftly argued for by Twenty Essex's Sam Goodman.")